College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Si, por supuesto

Supersoak that bro

Senior News Editor

Published: Thursday, April 30, 2009

Updated: Thursday, April 30, 2009

Is female ejaculation something to be ashamed of? No! Some women are blessed with the ability to supersoak their partner with varying amounts of bodily fluids. While most women are used to clitoral stimulation, getting off through bursts of feeling, female ejaculation is a more intense feeling.
How do you ejaculate?
It is a simple process that begins with the correct stimulation. This can be achieved through the use of the right dildo or a male/female who knows how to use his fingers. Located behind the pubic bone is a sac that fills up with fluid. What kind of fluid? Well, this fluid has two components of urine: urea and creatinine. For that sweet taste it has a high level of glucose and enzymes. It also contains prostatic acid phosphates, which is a characteristic of the prostate component of semen. Guess females and males are more similar than we initially thought.
In order to get the initial burst, fingers or a dildo need to be placed on this fluid-filled sac and stroke it. It will feel like you have to pee very badly. Get past thisthought and focus on the task at hand—ejaculating.
The ejaculation itself can cause male discomfort as it does feel like your being peed on. Look at it this way: She’s like a dog and you just made her so happy, she peed!
There is no way to directly tell if your partner is peeing on you or releasing this fluid concoction, as they are known to feel the same. However, everyone likes the feeling of pee and pee is the most sterile fluid; remember, it helps with jellyfish stings.
If you are worried about sexually transmitted infections, STIs, keep your mouth and eyes away, your going to want to revel in this beauty. I suppose, though, you could hold up a dental dam as a shield.
Many women become ashamed of this supersoaking ability. But, what you need to remember is yourself. The pleasure you are about to experience is so euphoric that you should sit back and squirt.
Before you are even able to ejaculate, there are some steps you need to follow. Be comfortable with your body, your partner’s and bodily fluids—they are natural. Remember this: the wetter, the better. I have told you where it is located and what to do now go supersoak that bro.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments

MCLA Senior
Fri May 8 2009 19:48
Nice, but wrong Raechel.

I don't think people are offended, I think they're more annoyed with the double standard at play here. First off, the reaction to Dan's article is based in ignorance, plain and simple. If people had been reading his work, they'd know he wasn't being serious and that he often takes a bitter, sarcastic tone to his work. That's his column. Also, don't say that it's because he was making fun of women, because if women are out of bounds to be made fun of, so are men, animals, children, books, TV, music, movies, grandmothers, grandfathers, technology . . . you see where I'm going with this?

That's not to say the paper should encourage insulting as a selling point but then again, that's what the modern news media is. Sniping, sensationalism and sexualization. People are merely ticked that Dan gets flak for a sarcastic and comedic article and this one comes along with a lackluster effort, misinformation, and the lovely equation of an female orgasm to dog piss. But hey, maybe that's your thing, I don't know and I don't care. All I know is that the Beacon has needed an overhaul for some time now and when the copy editors can't edit, the humor columns get literal criticism and when one of the most read stories is labeled "Super soak that bro", I think it's safe to say it's time for a reworking.

MCLA Senior
Fri May 8 2009 19:48
Nice, but wrong Raechel.

I don't think people are offended, I think they're more annoyed with the double standard at play here. First off, the reaction to Dan's article is based in ignorance, plain and simple. If people had been reading his work, they'd know he wasn't being serious and that he often takes a bitter, sarcastic tone to his work. That's his column. Also, don't say that it's because he was making fun of women, because if women are out of bounds to be made fun of, so are men, animals, children, books, TV, music, movies, grandmothers, grandfathers, technology . . . you see where I'm going with this?

That's not to say the paper should encourage insulting as a selling point but then again, that's what the modern news media is. Sniping, sensationalism and sexualization. People are merely ticked that Dan gets flak for a sarcastic and comedic article and this one comes along with a lackluster effort, misinformation, and the lovely equation of an female orgasm to dog piss. But hey, maybe that's your thing, I don't know and I don't care. All I know is that the Beacon has needed an overhaul for some time now and when the copy editors can't edit, the humor columns get literal criticism and when one of the most read stories is labeled "Super soak that bro", I think it's safe to say it's time for a reworking.

Your name
Thu May 7 2009 20:25
MCLA: Aiming high? You bet!

Senior News Editors from The Beacon are coming to a boring housewife magazine near you! YOU'RE not going to believe what they're writing about! They will change YOUR world if you have never read the meaningless drivel of a sex columnist!

Raechel
Thu May 7 2009 11:00
Um, it should strike you that many are saying "people get offended by Dan's column but not THIS?", when, clearly, you all are offended. And you're writing about it. Good on you.

I personally avoid this column because of some misinformation that it has invoked (i.e. washing a female condom and using it again). I respect that the Beacon is featuring a sex columnist, and am dandy with the subject matters (use a dental dam - great! body fluids ain't shameful - imagine that!), but I do question how much work goes into it.
But then, I question that about a lot of things... here's to a bright shiny new semester soon enough.

Beacon Fan
Tue May 5 2009 16:08
My god I didn't realize how stuffy MCLA has become. Is this not a liberal arts college? Aren't we supposed to be a little more open-minded than usual? And if you aren't, then well, why continue reading the columnist who writes about sex? She is just trying to be different and a little interesting. In case you have not noticed, there isn't exactly an abundance of news around this tiny little town and when there is, like the recent assaults, the school decides that they do not want The Beacon lying around with a front-page story about assaults on campus, so they remove the Beacon from easily accessible places the day they have an open house. IF anything, concern yourself with the fact that YOUR administration is Pro-Censor.

Oh and by all means, if you're going to complain about the punctuation and grammar of the paper, step to the plate and become a copy editor. Otherwise, your complaints are pretty pointless.

MCLA Senior
Mon May 4 2009 22:38
I disagree about the comment that sexuality has no place in a student paper. We're not quakers, sex happens and an article on it is not going to and shouldn't bother anyone. However, the manner in which this article is delivered and the lacking subject matter is laughable at most.
MCLA Senior
Mon May 4 2009 20:08
Apparently, criticism of the Beacon is illegal. Way to make like scientologists and silence your critics.

As I said before, I don't see how people get on Dan Peters' ass about his article. His column has always been sarcastic and relatively without a serious tone yet an article about female ejaculation that is not even newsworthy let alone factually correct is run without any complaining from the students. Yet, if Dan ran an column about guys giving facials and pearl necklaces as forms of male power and strength, he'd probably start getting bomb threats for being sexist and gross. I just don't appreciate the double standard the student body is running here. Yeah, Dan's article came off a bit rough but only to the ill informed.

MCLA Graudate
Mon May 4 2009 20:00
And you guys at The Beacon wonder why everyone at this school treats you like a big fat joke? I feel bad for the rest of the paper, you guys have to be lumped in with what amounts to "Oops I forgot to to my beacon article this week! I'd better pen down something loosely involving sex in 12 minutes!" First the dental dam crap and now this? As the only voice of the students on campus as well as our only printed news medium, The Beacon has once again proven itself to be a pile of literary garbage.
Your name
Mon May 4 2009 19:56
How is this appropriate? This is a student newspaper ... not cosmo. Sexuality has no place in a school newspaper. I don't care how you feel about female ejaculation or how to accomplish it or anything like that. That is not appropriate for a school periodical.
Jonathan Goranson
Mon May 4 2009 19:21
I graduated from MCLA and came here looking for Dan Peters' article and I guess now I know I won't be able to read it, but instead read about something I already know, nobody even cares about. Does it make sense to anyone else that I can't read a sarcastic article that could be misconstrued as offensive, but instead I get to read a worthless article that could only be valued as minimally informative, stupid, or both?

Since something like this wouldn't EVER make it on the news for TV, maybe I can get away with adding a comment that bashes blacks, gays, jews, black gays, black jews, gay blacks, gay jews, jewish blacks, jewish gays, black gay jews, black jewish gays, gay black jews, gay jewish blacks, jewish black gays and jewish gay blacks. But that would simply be uncalled for.

I see there's an idle threat that my IP address can be banned. I don't care. I paid off all of my loans and debts to MCLA, anyone who knows me knows I'm not racist, homophobic or anti-semitic, so in posting this I don't even owe anyone an apology.

For a "Senior News Editor," you should know the difference of "your," and "you're." And while you're editing, you should delete the part that begins with "Is female" and ends with "that bro." Friendly suggestion.

Your name
Mon May 4 2009 19:15
Also: Please, for the love of everything, learn the difference between your and you're! YOU'RE never gonna get hired if YOUR writing does not improve!
Dude
Mon May 4 2009 18:19
Yeah I'm going to have to agree. This is really stupid how people get pissed about Dan's article yet this gets published. Someone give me a reason to take the Beacon seriously again.
Your name
Sat May 2 2009 19:29
First off let me begin with a question, why do you get credit for these articles? I can sympathize with it being a slow news week, but honestly this column would be better suited in a non news low brow periodical like hustler or maybe Jugs, sorry its just not playboy material. What makes this newsworthy? I don't understand how a few sarcastic comments in Dan Peters column can cause such a stir yet no one is offended by this "Look at it this way: She’s like a dog and you just made her so happy, she peed!"
Ps. thanks for the how to on dental dams.






log out